Fidelity Mid-Year Review: 6 Key Trends in Digital Assets for 2026
Author: Fidelity Digital Assets
Compiled by: Jiahua, ChainCatcher
Mid-year is a good checkpoint for investors to assess how market dynamics have changed and whether their judgments from the beginning of the year still hold.
In the "2026 Outlook," the Fidelity Digital Assets research team believes that the key this year is not an immediate price increase, but a more subtle dynamic: the structural "remodeling" of the entire digital asset ecosystem. Although price performance has been occasionally flat and sometimes volatile this year, a closer look reveals that several underlying trends are continuously advancing.
This article summarizes the progress of several key themes from the "2026 Outlook" to date, pointing out which of our judgments have been validated, which have diverged, and what these changes may mean for the future.
1: Accelerated Integration of Digital Assets and Capital Markets
We previously anticipated that the integration of digital assets and traditional capital markets would continue to advance by 2026. So far, this trend is indeed moving forward, with some areas progressing even faster than expected.
Despite market fluctuations, the demand for exposure to digital assets through mainstream financial channels remains strong, and traditional platforms continue to expand their product lines.
Notably, the open interest in spot Bitcoin ETP options (which are not expected to launch until November 2024) is now comparable to options settled directly in Bitcoin, reflecting a continuous increase in adoption rates among institutions and mainstream investors.
The momentum in the tokenization space is also strengthening, with activity seemingly exceeding expectations. Traditional financial institutions are increasingly launching blockchain-based investment products, while large exchanges are collaborating with or acquiring stakes in digital asset platforms to broaden distribution channels and connect with on-chain infrastructure.
Meanwhile, regulatory clarity is also improving. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) jointly issued guidelines to establish classifications for digital assets, and the advancement of legislation such as the CLARITY Act indicates that market participants will welcome a clearer framework.
Overall, these developments suggest that digital assets are increasingly integrating into the broader financial system, driven by market demand and infrastructure expansion.
2: Rights of Token Holders Gradually Gaining Attention, but Still Unclear
We previously anticipated that by 2026, the interests of token holders would become more closely tied, with more on-chain enterprises prioritizing mechanisms like buybacks and clearer ownership.
So far, this direction seems unchanged, and experiments across the ecosystem are ongoing: from reserve-based buyback dynamics (e.g., Hyperliquid/USDC alliance) to governance and structural updates like the Aave DAO/Labs reorganization.
However, despite the expanding adoption of these mechanisms, a clear "token holder rights premium" has not yet been fully reflected in market pricing. This trend is advancing but remains in its early stages, as investors are still assessing which models can truly deliver sustained value accumulation.
3: Potential Shift in AI and Mining
We previously suggested that the competition for AI computing power might stabilize Bitcoin's hash rate growth, as miners redirect energy and infrastructure towards potentially more profitable avenues. This dynamic may be manifesting this year: the 30-day average hash rate and mining difficulty have decreased by approximately 8.8% and 7.8%, respectively.
While some of this can be attributed to seasonal factors, particularly winter-related power restrictions, the recent recovery (with hash rate rebounding about 1.3% from its low point and difficulty increasing about 8.8%) indicates that weather alone cannot fully explain this shift.
Looking at a longer trajectory, the growth rate of hash power has slowed compared to previous years, which may be an early signal of structural change. The business of AI data centers is becoming increasingly profitable, especially for large operators who can secure power infrastructure, which seems to be a driving force behind this trend.
Although still in its early stages, the observed slowdown in growth aligns with initial judgments and may reflect that miners are gradually shifting towards other sources of income.
4: Bitcoin at a New Turning Point
We previously anticipated that increasing the amount of data that can be written with the OP_RETURN opcode would not significantly inflate the blockchain (OP_RETURN is used for writing data on-chain, and since it requires a fee, relaxing its data limit has not led to abuse or network bloat). So far, the data seems to support this judgment.
The usage of larger OP_RETURN sizes (≥84 bytes) has remained relatively unchanged, and the overall growth of the blockchain remains within the predicted range (approximately 1.35–2.5MB). Other block utilization metrics indicate that capacity remains below 50%, suggesting that the increased data flexibility has not placed substantial pressure on the network.
Meanwhile, the focus has shifted to more macro network dynamics. Bitcoin Knots nodes have shown significant volatility, rapidly rising and then quickly falling, raising speculation about potential Sybil-like activities.
According to current data, Bitcoin Core nodes still account for about 77% of the network, while Knots nodes account for about 17%. Although still a minority, this presents a risk of unexpected splits—while the probability is low, it is not zero: under certain conditions, Knots nodes could diverge into a stagnant or less secure chain, which could occur in approximately 80 days based on current estimates.
However, Core's dominant share continues to anchor network consensus. Meanwhile, momentum around long-term security upgrades is also increasing. BIP-360 has been simplified to introduce quantum-resistant output types (Pay-to-Merkle-Root, abbreviated as P2MR); ongoing research on OP_CHECKSHRINCS reflects exploration into hash-based post-quantum signature schemes.
While there is no definitive timeline for the emergence of quantum threats, these developments indicate that the industry is increasingly prioritizing early preparations for the future security of the network.
5: Bears Temporarily in Control
In January of this year, we outlined two scenarios where bulls and bears would be evenly matched entering 2026, anticipating that macro conditions would lead to a nonlinear trend, despite structural fundamentals improving.
So far this year, the bearish scenario has largely prevailed: Bitcoin has fallen by 13%, driven by deleveraging triggered by liquidations, persistent inflation, and geopolitical uncertainties leading the market to expect further rate hikes. However, recent market performance reveals a more subtle dynamic.
After an initial round of selling triggered by recent geopolitical conflicts, Bitcoin rebounded and outperformed traditional assets during the same period, which may reflect a demand for high liquidity, neutral assets during times of stress.
Meanwhile, structural positives remain, including the continued formation of institutional capital, gradual improvement in regulatory clarity, and the expansion of global liquidity.
Although the short-term environment remains constrained, our broader judgment still seems valid, albeit with uneven progress.
6: Gold Strongly Maintains, What Happens Next?
We previously pointed out that it is not surprising for gold to have another strong year, supported by central bank demand for gold and the global trend of gradually moving away from the dollar system.
So far this year, gold rebounded nearly 30% amid geopolitical tensions, then retreated to a more moderate increase of about 3–4%. Despite the pullback, gold may still outperform the market by the end of the year.
Evidence supporting the move away from the dollar system is also increasing, including some emerging alternative settlement methods, such as Iran accepting Bitcoin for toll payments and payments related to activities in the Strait of Hormuz.
At the same time, central bank demand for gold remains strong. Recent data shows that accumulation is ongoing, and notably, gold has surpassed the dollar and U.S. Treasury bonds to become a major component of global reserves.
The performance of gold and the continued demand from central banks aligns closely with our initial judgments; however, the anticipated strong performance of Bitcoin has yet to materialize.
Conclusion: Building Strength Beneath the Surface
As we reach mid-year, the digital asset landscape for 2026 reflects a balance between short-term pressures and long-term progress. Several themes from the "Outlook" are developing as expected, particularly regarding institutional participation, regulation, and infrastructure; however, others remain in early stages or have not yet fully materialized.
For investors, this indicates the need to look beyond short-term price fluctuations to see how structural changes are taking shape. Many foundational elements supporting the next phase of growth seem to be thickening, even if they have not yet fully manifested.
You may also like

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight
Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.



