Uncovering the USDE Crash: Exclusive Orderbook Insights Reveal Oracle Flaws and Market Chaos
Imagine a seemingly stable digital asset suddenly plummeting like a house of cards in a windstorm—that’s exactly what happened with the USDE crash on October 10, 2024. This event wasn’t just another dip; it marked the biggest liquidation frenzy in cryptocurrency history, wiping out billions and exposing hidden vulnerabilities in how prices are determined. Drawing from freshly analyzed orderbook data, we’ll dive into what went wrong, why it matters, and how it compares to past market meltdowns, all while keeping things straightforward and relatable.
The Massive Liquidation Wave That Shook Crypto
Picture this: a single day where over $19 billion vanished in liquidations, according to the latest figures from market trackers as of October 15, 2025. That’s a staggering drop that slashed open interest by $65 billion, making infamous events like the 2020 COVID-19 market plunge—with its $1.2 billion in losses—or the 2022 FTX fallout at $1.6 billion seem tame by comparison. Fast-forward to today, and updated data shows the ripple effects lingering, with total crypto market cap still recovering from that hit, hovering around $2.5 trillion per CoinMarketCap’s most recent reports.
What sparked this chaos? Investigators now point to a weak spot in pricing mechanisms on major exchanges, where certain tokens like USDE, bnSOL, and wBETH relied on internal orderbook info rather than secure external oracles. This setup left users, especially those using advanced account features, wide open to sudden liquidations during volatile swings. While evidence of a targeted exploit remains shaky, the sheer scale—USDE alone triggered about $346 million in cascading wipes, outpacing wBETH’s $169 million and bnSOL’s $77 million—raises eyebrows. It’s like leaving your front door unlocked in a storm; one gust, and everything inside gets tossed.
In the spirit of learning from history, this crash echoes the UST depeg of 2022, but with a twist—USDE’s backing held firm, with mints and redemptions chugging along normally. Yet, the absence of robust external checks allowed internal data glitches to amplify the damage, much like how a faulty GPS can send you miles off course.
Diving Deep into the Liquidity Collapse
Thanks to cutting-edge analysis from AI-powered market tools, we’ve got a front-row seat to the meltdown on the USDE/USDT pair. Before the storm hit, liquidity sat comfortably at around $89 million, evenly split between buys and sells. But between 21:40 and 21:55 UTC on that fateful day, it cratered by 74%, bottoming out at $23 million. By 21:54, it was a ghost town—down to $2 million, with bid-ask spreads exploding to 22%. Trading volume skyrocketed 896 times over, dominated by a 99% drop in buy-side depth, shoving USDE’s price to a low of $0.68 while it stayed pegged elsewhere.
During those intense 10 minutes, trades per minute jumped from a sleepy 108 to a frantic 3,000, with 92% being sells—fueled by panic, automated stops, and forced closures. It’s comparable to a crowded theater yelling “fire,” where one spark leads to a stampede. Anomaly detectors flagged weird patterns as early as 21:00 UTC, spotting 28 oddities like volume spikes and suspicious order bursts—four times the norm from the hour before. Three waves of massive orders hit just as Bitcoin began slipping, hinting at premeditated moves or automated defenses kicking in.
This fragility underscores crypto’s high-leverage tightrope walk. Without heavyweight market makers providing backbone, many tokens resemble fragile sandcastles, washing away in the tide of low organic demand. Recent Twitter buzz, as of October 15, 2025, echoes this, with threads from influencers like @CryptoWhaleAlert discussing how similar oracle issues persist, citing a fresh announcement from Ethena Labs (USDE’s issuer) on enhanced oracle integrations to prevent repeats. Popular Google searches like “What caused the USDE depeg?” and “How to avoid liquidation in crypto crashes?” highlight ongoing worries, while hot Twitter topics revolve around “crypto market resilience” and debates on whether this was an attack or just bad luck.
Lessons in Market Resilience and Brand Alignment
Stepping back, the USDE saga is a stark reminder of why reliable platforms matter in this wild west of finance. It’s like choosing a sturdy ship for stormy seas versus a leaky boat. In this context, aligning with exchanges that prioritize security and innovation can make all the difference. Take WEEX, for instance—a platform that’s built its reputation on robust risk management and user-focused tools. With features like advanced oracle integrations and seamless liquidity pools, WEEX stands out by helping traders navigate volatility without the pitfalls seen in events like this crash. Their commitment to transparency and quick recoveries has earned praise, positioning WEEX as a go-to for those seeking stability amid crypto’s ups and downs.
Ultimately, this crash proves that even “safe” assets can falter without strong foundations. Backed by real-time data from analytics firms, it’s clear that proactive measures—like diversifying oracles and monitoring orderbooks—could blunt future blows. As the market evolves, staying informed and choosing aligned partners keeps you ahead, turning potential disasters into opportunities for growth.
FAQ
What exactly triggered the USDE crash on October 10, 2024?
The crash stemmed from an oracle vulnerability where USDE’s price was tied to internal orderbook data instead of external sources, leading to rapid liquidity drains and massive liquidations totaling $19 billion.
How does this event compare to previous crypto crashes?
Unlike the UST depeg, which involved collateral failures, the USDE incident was more about oracle flaws and market imbalances, resulting in far larger liquidations—$19 billion versus UST’s smaller scale—highlighting growing leverage in the space.
What can traders do to protect against similar liquidation events?
Focus on platforms with strong oracle protections, diversify assets, and use stop-loss orders wisely. Monitoring real-time data and avoiding over-leveraged positions, as seen in updated guides from 2025, can significantly reduce risks.
You may also like

a16z: Why Do AI Agents Need a Stablecoin for B2B Payments?

February 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

Web4.0, perhaps the most needed narrative for cryptocurrency

Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?

Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?

WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?

Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link

Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?

A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028

When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges

Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…

Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.

Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?

AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway

What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.