Natura Changes CEO: Carlucci Returns After a Decade
Natura has just made one of the most symbolic leadership changes in Brazilian retail. Alessandro Carlucci, who served as CEO of the company from 2004 to 2014, returns to the position following the departure of João Paulo Ferreira, who held the role for ten years. The transition is expected to take place at the end of September.
This move is not exactly a surprise for those closely following the company's governance. Carlucci had already returned to Natura's board in April last year and took on the role of chairman in March this year, replacing Fábio Barbosa, who moved to the advisory board alongside the trio of founders.
Ferreira, for his part, stated that he will dedicate himself to other projects, without detailing what they would be. The market's reading is that the change had been on the company's radar for months but depended on the alignment of various simultaneous factors.
What Motivated the Leadership Change at Natura
According to people close to the operation, the change had been planned, but the ideal timeline faced delays. The creation of the advisory board, the entry of Advent Fund as a significant shareholder with the right to appoint two board members, and the need to mature investments in systems and processes prevented everything from happening at once.
The departure of the founders from active management also weighed in. Natura is experiencing a generational transition in leadership, something that Brazilian family businesses frequently face. As we have discussed in analyses of corporate governance in Brazil, these transitions often define the next value cycle for listed companies.
Fábio Barbosa acknowledged that ideally, all changes would have been made at once, but that "the stars did not align at the right moment." This phrase aptly summarizes the complexity of reorganizing the top of a company that has undergone a radical transformation in recent years.
A Very Different Natura from the One Carlucci Left
When Carlucci left Natura in 2014 to move to the United States, the company was at the peak of its expansion phase. The acquisition of Aesop, The Body Shop, and Avon International was part of an ambitious thesis to become a global beauty group.
What followed was a painful digestion. The integration of the brands consumed capital, managerial energy, and focus. Avon International, in particular, was a bet that did not pay off. The Body Shop ended up being sold and entered judicial recovery in the UK. Aesop was sold to L'Oréal for $2.5 billion, a deal that brought financial relief but symbolized the abandonment of the conglomerate model.
Today, Natura is essentially what it has always been at its core: a Brazilian direct sales cosmetics company with a significant presence in Latin America. The simplification of the portfolio has been described internally as "brutal," and the numbers confirm this. The company is valued at R$ 12 billion on the stock exchange, with the stock accumulating a decline of 4.5% over the past twelve months. To put this in context, the Ibovespa rose about 9% in the same period, highlighting the stock's underperformance.
What is Carlucci's Plan for Natura Now
The new (and returning) CEO was clear in stating that the transition will be "without rupture." There will be no strategic pivot. The pillars remain the same as those already communicated to the market: strengthen existing brands, invest in communication and product innovation, expand the multichannel ecosystem, and accelerate the digitalization of direct sales.
Two points deserve special attention. The first is the improvement in service levels for consultants and end consumers. This is an operational issue that directly impacts the retention of the sales force, which is critical for direct sales companies. With the advancement of e-commerce and social networks as sales channels, maintaining the relevance of consultants requires heavy investment in technology and logistics.
The second point is the expansion in the Hispanic region. Natura already has operations in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru, but these markets have never reached the scale the company projected. The Spanish-speaking Latin America represents the main avenue for organic growth for the company, especially now that the portfolio is concentrated.
Carlucci brings to the chair a rare experience: he knows Natura's culture from the inside (he joined the company in 1989), has led the company for a decade, and has spent the last few years exposed to other governance environments. He was a board member of Lojas Renner and chairman of Azzas2154 for seven years, two companies with high management standards.
What Investors Should Watch Going Forward
The investment thesis in Natura today is fundamentally different from what it was five years ago. It is no longer a global beauty conglomerate. It is a bet on the operational execution of a simplified company, with strong brands in Brazil and growth potential in Latin America.
The market will evaluate Carlucci based on practical metrics: evolution of EBITDA margin, revenue growth in the Hispanic region, productivity per consultant, and free cash flow generation. The era of large acquisitions is over. What matters now is efficiency.
As we discussed in analyses of the listed Brazilian retail sector, companies undergoing cycles of simplification often have a window for market re-evaluation when they prove that the new structure consistently generates value. Natura is at this inflection point.
With a market value of R$ 12 billion and a CEO promising continuity without rupture, the company bets that operational discipline will achieve what acquisitions could not: deliver sustainable returns to shareholders. The next two or three quarters will tell if the market will buy into this narrative.
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

Focus: Inflation Eases, But Declining GDP Raises Concerns

Predictions of Market Regulation Spark a Political Battle

Warren Buffett Turns 96: The Investments That Made Him a Wall Street Legend

After MiniMax's Stock Price Rebounds 92%: What Remains When a Model Company Removes the Model

FBI and Australian police charge two in TeamPCP probe

Meta Faces Dilemma After AI Layoffs: Cybersecurity Incidents Up 40%, Cleanup Time Up 70%

Bitcoin Holds $78K As Strait Of Hormuz Strike Lifts Oil Above $90

Earnings from Cryptocurrency Led to a Russian Woman Losing 4.5 Million Rubles

Chinese AI Through the Eyes of Silicon Valley VCs: Sanctions Didn't Lock It Down, but Instead Brought Out a 'Monster'

Consolidation in Ranges and Rate Reevaluation: Trader Assesses Bitcoin and Ethereum Movement Scenarios

Action Strategy (MSTR): Is the bottom behind us now? Analysis by Vincent Ganne

The Government Officialized a New Salary Increase for Military, Security Forces, and Public Employees: How Much Will It Be

Alipay's Stance: Stablecoins Enter AI

Ontology halts mainnet block production over potential security concern

Digital Ruble Fails to Generate Significant Interest Among Russians, Says Sberbank

AI Scam Hits $3.2 Million Per Incident, Crypto Security Battlefield Shifts from 'Code' to 'Scams'

Matt Damon to Keynote at Ripple Swell 2026 in New York

XRP Ledger lending vote: What XRP holders should know

WEEX Trade to Earn Series 6: How Futures Trading Fees Relate to Market Volatility

How Paintings Could Have Become Part of the Digital Economy, but Didn't

Shein's IPO and China's PMI: What Changes for Markets

From Pay to One-Stop Asset Management, BiyaPay Expands Global Diverse Financial Services Boundaries

Trump's Cryptocurrency Scheme Rakes in $1.4 Billion While Investors Lose $4.7 Billion

Zcash private transactions could fall below 200ms

Behind the Surge of Robinhood Chain: Real Prosperity or Emotional Premium?
![[Block Media 1st Term 6th Reader Committee Meeting] "In-depth Articles Needed for Differentiation ⋯ Impressive Critique of Altcoin Listings by Chairperson Park Hyun-joo"](/public-static/9_8dc682caea.png?format=avif)
[Block Media 1st Term 6th Reader Committee Meeting] "In-depth Articles Needed for Differentiation ⋯ Impressive Critique of Altcoin Listings by Chairperson Park Hyun-joo"

A 36-day staking bottleneck is costing Ethereum depositors over $350,000 in lost rewards daily

AI Creates Abundance, BTC Creates Scarcity: What Web3 Truly Changes Is Not Production Relations, But Value Relations

Who is Selling Yushu? Large-Scale Transfer of High-Level Shares, 228.7 Million Shares to Be Unlocked Next Year

